Quiet quitting dan Produktivitas Organisasi: Peran Work-life balance dan Organizational culture sebagai Mediator

Authors

  • Audy Hakim Universitas Sehati Indonesia
  • Puspitasari Puspitasari Universitas Sehati Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69688/asbak.v4i1.1281

Keywords:

quiet quitting, work-life balance, organizational culture, organizational productivity, SEM-PLS

Abstract

Kecenderungan karyawan membatasi kontribusi pada tuntutan formal pekerjaan tanpa memberikan usaha diskresioner di luar peran yang ditetapkan berkembang menjadi isu strategis dalam manajemen sumber daya manusia pascapandemi. Penelitian ini menganalisis hubungan struktural antara quiet quitting dan produktivitas organisasi serta menguji peran mediasi work-life balance dan organizational culture. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain cross-sectional diterapkan terhadap 100 responden karyawan aktif sektor publik dan swasta di Indonesia yang memenuhi kriteria penelitian. Data dianalisis menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) dengan prosedur bootstrapping 5.000 subsample. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa quiet quitting berkaitan negatif dan signifikan dengan produktivitas organisasi (β = −0.311, p < 0.001) dan organizational culture (β = −0.544, p < 0.001), namun berkaitan positif dengan work-life balance (β = +0.376, p < 0.001). Organizational culture dan work-life balance terbukti memediasi hubungan tersebut: efek tidak langsung melalui work-life balance sebesar +0.170 (mediasi parsial inkonsisten), melalui organizational culture sebesar −0.155 (mediasi parsial komplementer), dan melalui jalur serial organizational culture–work-life balance sebesar −0.116 (mediasi serial komplementer). Model struktural menjelaskan 51,2% varians produktivitas organisasi. Temuan mendukung seluruh sembilan hipotesis penelitian dan memberikan kontribusi teoritis terhadap pengembangan model integratif yang menghubungkan quiet quitting dengan produktivitas melalui mekanisme keseimbangan kehidupan kerja dan budaya organisasi.

References

[1] Gallup, State of the global workplace: 2023 report. Gallup Inc, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx

[2] N. Taufik, A. Rosyadi, and M. Aliyuddin, ‘Why millennials and Gen Z are silently leaving their jobs? Unraveling the quiet quitting trend’, Asian Management and Business Review, vol. 4, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.20885/AMBR.vol4.iss2.art7.

[3] T. T. Thu Trang and N. Thu Trang, ‘Job burnout and quiet quitting in the Vietnamese banking sector: The moderation effect of optimism’, Cogent Business & Management, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2371549.

[4] A. Adedeji, C. Langel, A. Feick, M.-S. Borges Greibaum, Rahimi, and S. Hanft-Robert, ‘Work-life balance and mental health outcomes for Generation Z in Germany’, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 987–991, 2023, doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002934.

[5] S. Srivastava, Kapoor, and Qadir, ‘Sailing through silence: Exploring how negative gossip leaves breeding grounds for quiet quitting in the workplace’, International Journal of Conflict Management, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 733–755, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-07-2023-0139.

[6] W. Purnomo, N., and R. Oktafiani, ‘The silent exodus: A systematic review of quiet quitting and its impact on employee productivity and organizational culture’, Jurnal Manajemen, vol. 16, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.32832/jm-uika.v46i2.19211.

[7] S. Suhendar, Artati, and Rohman, ‘The new trend: Why Indonesian digital start-up employees are opting for quiet quitting?’, WSEAS Transactions on Computer Research, vol. 11, pp. 166–180, 2023, doi: 10.37394/232018.2023.11.15.

[8] A. Serenko, ‘The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: Recommendations for employees, knowledge managers, and national policymakers’, Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–43, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0792.

[9] Maheshwari, ‘Quiet quitting in the contemporary workplace discourse: A systematic literature review of antecedents, sectoral dynamics and strategic interventions’, Management Review Quarterly, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s41301-026-00604-1.

[10] J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, ‘A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM’, Sage, 2017.

[11] A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, ‘Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward’, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 273–285, 2017, doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056.

[12] H. Shen and C. Ren, ‘Reconceptualizing employee disengagement as both attitudinal and behavioral: Narratives from China’, Public Relations Review, vol. 49, no. 2, p. 102318, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102318.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Hakim, A., & Puspitasari, P. (2026). Quiet quitting dan Produktivitas Organisasi: Peran Work-life balance dan Organizational culture sebagai Mediator. AsbaK, 4(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.69688/asbak.v4i1.1281