Deteksi Serangan Siber Berbasis Machine Learning: Systematic Literature Review terhadap Kinerja Algoritma, Tantangan Implementasi, dan Arah Penelitian
Keywords:
Intrusion Detection System, Adversarial Machine Learning, Federated Learning, Explainable AI, PRISMAAbstract
Laju eskalasi ancaman siber yang melampaui kapasitas sistem deteksi berbasis aturan statis mendorong kebutuhan mendesak akan pendekatan deteksi yang adaptif dan berbasis data. Kajian ini bertujuan memetakan kinerja algoritma machine learning (ML) dalam mendeteksi serangan siber, mengidentifikasi tantangan implementasi yang berulang, serta mengevaluasi tingkat kematangan tren penelitian masa depan. Metode yang digunakan adalah Systematic Literature Review (SLR) mengacu pada panduan Carrera-Rivera et al. [6], dengan penelusuran sistematik pada enam basis data akademik: IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, ACM Digital Library, Google Scholar, dan Portal Garuda. Dari 156 artikel yang teridentifikasi, 19 studi ditetapkan sebagai korpus final melalui prosedur PRISMA terdiri atas 9 studi primer (2020–2025) dan 10 studi landasan (sebelum 2020), setelah melewati penilaian kualitas dua dimensi: rigor metodologis dan relevansi industri. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa CNN dan LSTM mencapai akurasi deteksi 97–99%, mengungguli Random Forest (95–98%) dan SVM (90–97%) dalam skenario klasifikasi kompleks. Empat tantangan implementasi yang paling konsisten dijumpai adalah ketidakseimbangan data latih, kendala latensi real-time, serangan adversarial, dan opasitas model deep learning. Dataset CICIDS2017 dan UNSW-NB15 semakin menggantikan posisi NSL-KDD sebagai standar evaluasi karena lebih merepresentasikan kondisi jaringan modern. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa federated learning dan explainable AI (XAI) merupakan dua arah penelitian yang paling matang untuk mengatasi hambatan privasi data dan opasitas model. Kontribusi utama kajian ini terletak pada pemisahan eksplisit antara studi empiris terkini dan studi landasan historis dalam satu kerangka SLR terpadu, menghasilkan peta kinerja algoritma yang dapat langsung dijadikan acuan bagi praktisi keamanan dalam menentukan pendekatan ML yang sesuai dengan kapasitas infrastruktur organisasi.
References
[1] ENISA. (2024). ENISA Threat Landscape 2024. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2024
[2] Khraisat, A., Gondal, I., Vamplew, P., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2020). Survey of intrusion detection systems: Techniques, datasets and challenges. Cybersecurity, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-019-0038-7
[3] Ferrag, M. A., Maglaras, L., Moschoyiannis, S., & Janicke, H. (2020). Deep learning for cyber security intrusion detection: Approaches, datasets, and comparative study. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 50, 102419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102419
[4] Ahmad, Z., Khan, A. S., Shiang, C. W., Abdullah, J., & Ahmad, F. (2021). Network intrusion detection system: A systematic study of machine learning and deep learning approaches. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 32(1), e4150. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4150
[5] Berman, D. S., Buczak, A. L., Chavis, J. S., & Corbett, C. L. (2019). A survey of deep learning methods for cyber security. Information, 10(4), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10040122
[6] Carrera-Rivera, A., Ochoa, W., Larrinaga, F., & Lasa, G. (2022). How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research. MethodsX, 9, 101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895
[7] Yang, L., Zhang, H., Shen, H., Huang, X., Zhou, X., Rong, G., & Shao, D. (2021). Quality assessment in systematic literature reviews: A software engineering perspective. Information and Software Technology, 130, 106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106397
[8] Vinayakumar, R., Alazab, M., Soman, K. P., Poornachandran, P., Al-Nemrat, A., & Venkatraman, S. (2019). Deep learning approach for intelligent intrusion detection system. IEEE Access, 7, 41525–41550. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895334
[9] Vinayakumar, R., Soman, K. P., & Poornachandran, P. (2017). Applying convolutional neural network for network intrusion detection. Proceedings of ICACCI 2017, 1222–1228. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8126009
[10] Kim, J., Shin, N., Jo, S. Y., & Kim, S. H. (2017). Method of intrusion detection using deep neural network. Proceedings of IEEE BigComp 2017, 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIGCOMP.2017.7881684
[11] Ayub, M. A., Johnson, W. A., Talbert, D. A., & Siraj, A. (2020). Model evasion attack on intrusion detection systems using adversarial machine learning. Proceedings of 54th CISS, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISS48834.2020.1570617116
[12] Zhang, H., Yu, X., Ren, P., Luo, C., & Min, G. (2019). Deep adversarial learning in intrusion detection: A data augmentation enhanced framework. arXiv:1901.07949. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.07949
[13] Mumuni, A., & Mumuni, F. (2025). Automated data processing and feature engineering for deep learning and big data applications: A survey. Journal of Information and Intelligence, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiixd.2024.01.002
[14] Rahman, M. A., Asyhari, A. T., Leong, L. S., Satrya, G. B., Tao, M. H., & Zolkipli, M. F. (2020). Scalable machine learning-based intrusion detection system for IoT-enabled smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102324
[15] Gupta, B. B., Gaurav, A., Arya, V., Attar, R. W., & Bansal, S. (2024). Advanced BERT and CNN-based computational model for phishing detection in enterprise systems. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 141(3), 2165–2183. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.056473
[16] Moustafa, N., & Slay, J. (2016). The evaluation of Network Anomaly Detection Systems: Statistical analysis of the UNSW-NB15 data set and the comparison with the KDD99 data set. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 25(1–3), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2015.1125974
[17] Sharafaldin, I., Lashkari, A. H., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018). Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization. Proceedings of 4th ICISSP, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006639801080116
[18] Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2017), 4765–4774. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874
[19] Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298981
[20] Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
[21] Khraisat, A., Alazab, A., Singh, S., Jan, T., & Gomez, A. (2024). Survey on federated learning for intrusion detection system: Concept, architectures, aggregation strategies, challenges, and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3687124
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wahyudi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






